It is now widely accepted that the limitations of LLM powered Agents which include hallucinations, non-determinism, and non-explainable outcomes, make these agents unsuitable for autonomous deployment in high stakes, regulated, & mission critical applications requiring Accuracy, repeatability, and auditability.
It is now also widely accepted that Human verification of LLM agents is a critical and often legally mandated necessity in high stakes, & regulated domains such as healthcare, finance, and law. This oversight is seen essential because of the above limitations of LLM powered autonomous AI Agents.
There is however a verification-value paradox emerging as recent studies have shown that the burden of human verification of an LLM's reasoning outweighs the time saved automating the reasoning in high-stakes, complex scenarios.
Verification is time-consuming for humans as they must essentially re-do or thoroughly check the reasoning process to ensure correctness. The cognitive load of verifying potentially complex reasoning can be significant. Not only does this negate the time saved deploying autonomous agents but also human subject matter experts find more job satisfaction in making the complex decisions themseves rather than verifying non-auditable agents.
XpertRule have pioneered a new approach for developing complex decisioning Agents to overcome the verification-value paradox! The cornerstones of this approach are implemented in our XpertAgents platform:
The XpertAgent design time agent not only translates documents of rules into no-code graphical rules for easy verification by subject matter experts, but it also captures the extensive knowledge / decision engineering expertise of our team to empower the design time agent into instructing / prompting the LLM on how to structure the decisions models for different domains such as troubleshooting and compliance.